#StackBounty: #python #multiple-inheritance Maintaining readability when using super() for direct multiple inheritance

Bounty: 50

For the case of the most basic multiple inheritance:

class A:
    def __init__(self, a):
        self.a = a

class B:
    def __init__(self, b):
        self.b = b

class C(A, B):
    def __init__(self, a, b): 
        A.__init__(self, a)
        B.__init__(self, b)

I do not see why super() should be used. I suppose you could implement it with kwargs, but that is surely less readable than the above method. I am yet to find any answers on stack overflow which are in favour of this method, yet surely for this case it is the most satisfactory?

There are a lot of questions marked as duplicate on this topic, but no satisfactory answers for this exact case. This question addresses multiple inheritance and the use of super() for a diamond inheritance. In this case there is no diamond inheritance and neither parent class have any knowledge of each other, so they shouldn’t need to call super() like this suggests.

This answer deals with the use of super in this scenario but without passing arguments to __init__ like is done here, and this answer deals with passing arguments but is again a diamond inheritance.

Get this bounty!!!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.